Leś. Pr. Bad., 2009, Vol. 70 (2): 113-122.
Ocena zależności między występowaniem w drewnie substancji o
charakterze fenolowym a jego rozkładem przez wybrane gatunki grzybów
saprotroficznych i pasożytniczych
Correlations between phenolic compounds in wood and its decay by
chosen species
of saprotrophic and parasitic fungi
Paweł Zarzyński
Publication order reference: Szkoła Główna Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego,
Wydział Leśny, Katedra Ochrony Lasu i Ekologii, Zakład Mikologii i
Fitopatologii Leśnej,
ul. Nowoursynowska 159/34, 02-766 Warszawa, Fax +48 22 59 38
154,
e-mail: pawel.zarzynski@wp.pl
Abstract. To investigate natural chemical substances
that might be responsible for wood protection, statistical comparisons
were made. The previous work results describing the range of
wood-destroying abilities of some fungi were used. Twelve different
species of fungi causing all patterns of rot were investigated:
Daedalea quercina, Fomes fomentarius, Fomitopsis officinalis,
Fomitopsis pinicola, Heterobasidion annosum, Laetiporus sulphureus,
Phellinus pini, Piptoporus betulinus, Schizophyllum commune, Serpula
lacrymans, Stereum hirsutum and Trametes versicolor. To describe their
destroying abilities, wood samples from 25 different tree species were
taken and exposed on mycelium under controlled laboratory conditions.
Their decaying rates were calculated after 30, 60 and 90 days of
exposition. The results were compared with the quantities of different
phenolic compounds identified in all kinds of wood using statistical
methods (linear correlation). A total number of 1368 indexes of
correlation were calculated. A valid negative correlation might
indicate that some phenolic compounds may work as inhibitors of fungi
growth and wood decay. However, a valid positive correlation might show
that some of these substances may also work as fungi growth catalysers
(accelerators).
Comparing all results of controlled wood decay for the three exposure
times with the quantities of phenolic compounds from wood, 10 potential
inhibitors and 15 catalysers of fungi growth were investigated.
Potential inhibitors might be: 3',5'-Dimethoxyacethophenone,
isoeugenol, 2-Cyclopentene-1-on-2-hydroxy-3-methyl; furanone
(2-furanon); 1,4-buthanodiamine-2,3-dimethoxy N,N,N',N'tetramethyl;
resorcinol, Levoglukosan, Acethylobenzoic-2,5-dimethoxy acid;
2,5-Furanodion-3-methyl and syringol. Potential catalysers might be:
eugenol, guaiacylo acethone, 2-furanocarboxy-5-(hydroxymethyl)
aldeehyde, 2-Metoxy-6-winylophenol, metoxybenzenodiol, vanilic acid,
3,4-dimethoxybenzoic acid, syringe aldehyde,
1-(2,4,6-trihydroxyphenyl)-2-pentanone, palmitic acid, Isolapachol,
10-H-phenoxasilin-10,10-dimethyl, alfa Lapachone; 4-hydroxy-3-methoxy
acethylobenzoic acid and koniferol.
However, these conclusions are only the result of statistical
comparison and need to be proved in laboratory tests, showing proper
abilities of all these substances for natural wood protection from
saprotrophic and parasitic fungi.
Key words: natural wood protection, inhibitors of fungi growth, catalyzers of fungi growth.

